I've taken to having the
radio on during my night shifts; on night shifts I'm working on my
own for much of the time and the radio can be company. When I drive
to work the radio boils my piss for half an hour or so; night shifts
have hours of urinary vaporisation.
Last night there was a
documentary on Josie Cunningham. Her agent was making great show of
how it's good that she is hated by so many people as that makes for
good publicity, and how her tweets (on Twitter) are read by
millions.
No - I didn't know who
she was either. I had to look
her up on the Internet - I had no idea who she is. Apparently
she's famous for having had a boob job on the NHS, and having thus
achieved a moderate amount of fame she now generally acts
outrageously in order to self-promote.
As my favorite periodical
once described her, she is FFFA (Famous For F... All). But for
all that she is FFFA, it pays her bills. The sad part of her sorry
tale is that the general public have nothing better to do than to lap
up her antics.
There was also talk about
a call from Sussex Police for men in a Sussex village to come forward
to provide DNA samples to eliminate themselves from a murder
investigation.
This case made my piss
boil. Not so much the case itself as the reaction to it. Surely it
makes sense to have everyone's DNA on file? Given that there is blood
at a murder scene (or "other fluids" at a rape scene)
with the entire population's DNA on file it would be a simple matter
to eliminate the innocent. And (more importantly) a difficult
matter for those whose DNA was found at the crime scene to explain
what it was doing there.
So why were the
bleeding-heart-civil-liberty brigade whinging about this? Is it such
a problem to have one's DNA record on a police file? After all, other
than using it to eliminate or incriminate what else are the police
going to do with this data?
And a few minutes air
time was devoted to a prospective UKIP MP who has announced that the
jobless should not be allowed the privilege of being
allowed to drive a car.
Lynton Yates, the party's
candidate for Charnwood in Leicestershire believes the jobless
should catch buses rather than clog the roads with traffic. In a
campaign leaflet handed to constituents, he argues that all those who
claim benefits should automatically have their driving licences
suspended. Presumably this twit feels he can get more votes from
those in work than those not in work. And (in true UKIP fashion)
this chap is rather vague about the specifics of how this policy
would be put into practice.
It was with something of
a sense of relief when the day shift arrived and I could turn the
radio off. I came home via a geo-diversion to Wye. Once home I
walked my dog round to Frog's Island and back home via Pets at Home
where I bought him a huge bone. The idea was that the bone would keep
him occupied whilst I slept.
It didn't really. He must
have jumped on and off of the bed a dozen times during the day.
Added to that the phone didn't stop ringing. It made for rather poor
sleep.
I'm now off to another
night shift... via sax lesson. I don't think this one will go very
well...
"After all, other than using it to eliminate or incriminate what else are the police going to do with this data?" Use it to falsify evidence? The police have never done that before, Have they?
ReplyDelete