I was woken by my alarm this morning. That's twice in one month that I've not beaten it by two hours. I'm looking on having had so much sleep as being a good thing. I'm also reminded that a few weeks ago I downloaded a sleep management app for my phone. Perhaps I might turn the thing on? (The app that is - not the phone)
I got myself into gear
promptly this morning, left for work a little earlier than usual and
got that
geocache that I mentioned yesterday hidden. There are precious
few of the things in the Canterbury area, and fewer active geocachers
over there, so I expect that activity on this one will be slow.
Having said that, it was found for the first time about an hour after
it went live. Perhaps the denizens of Canterbury are getting more
into this silly game?
The morning's radio
program had news about how
social media will be policed in future. There are apparently
concerns that prosecuting people for writing "offensive,
shocking or disturbing" messages would have a very bad effect on
the right of free speech. I can't see it really affecting me or this
blog. As someone who writes a lot I might be critical of the world
and those in it, but I try to avoid giving offence. Sometimes I even
manage to do so.
Social media websites are
being encouraged to embrace this new legislation, and persistent
"trolls" will be prosecuted. This could be a good thing - a
family member has recently been the victim of cyber-bullying. A
mechanism to stop this would be good. But will it make social media a
better place? Not really. There's no secret that I am very loathe to
post in internet forums because of the bad feeling that is rife in so
many of these places. Realistically I blame the schools for not
teaching people literacy in the first place. Internet forums are
places where people disagree. But how many of us can disagree without
becoming disagreeable? How should one disagree politely or civilly?
"I disagree with
you for the following reasons..." is a valid statement. "I
disagree with you therefore you are stupid" or "You
disagree with me therefore you are wrong" or "because
you believe "A" you therefore believe "B", "C"
and "D"" are not valid. However statements like
this seem to form the basis of most of the (so-called) on-line
discussions.
At school I learned
logic and debating skills. There is a world of difference between
reasoned debate and petty squabbling. It's a shame that the Internet
can't see more of reasoned debate and less of petty squabbling.
My phone rang. The most
recent fruit of my loin had come home for the day and had taken Fudge
for a walk. Whilst they were out, a bird had startled both dogs. Sid
hadn't been bothered by the feathered fellow, but Fudge had felt
affronted, and leapt off after it in pursuit. The bird apparently
flew into a hedge. Fudge also flew into that hedge, and got stuck.
Daddies Little Angel wasn't at all impressed at having to extricate a
Patagonian Tripehound from thick privet. (Apparently the Kennel
Club has yet to recognise "Patagonian Tripehound" as an
official breed of dog)
I had a good lunch today
- the works Christmas buffet made for a serious feast. So much so
that I gave myself a rather spectacular guts ache that lasted most of
the afternoon and well into the evening.
We also had the exchange
of "Secret Santa" gifts. I got a Christmas collar
for Fudge and a couple of dog mince pies. He likes the mince pies,
but he's not keen on his collar. I expect he will eat it before the
weekend. Last Saturday I bought him a nice new rope toy and it is now
nothing more than broken fragments. I suppose I can't really expect
that much quality from the pound shop, but I live in hope.
And so to bed; hoping my
stomach will settle....
No comments:
Post a Comment